Welcome aboard Visitor...

Daily Screenshot

Server Costs Target


0% of target met.

Latest Topics

- I will no longer be hosting this server »
- Anyone still playing from a decade ago or longer? »
- Game still active. NICE! »
- help me »
- Password resett »
- Darkspace Idea/Opinion Submission Thread »
- Rank Bug maybe? »
- Next patch .... »
- Nobody will remember me...but. »
- 22 years...asking for help from one community to another »

Development Blog

- Roadmap »
- Hello strangers, it’s been a while... »
- State of DarkSpace Development »
- Potential planetary interdictor changes! »
- The Silent Cartographer »

Combat Kills

Combat kills in last 24 hours:
No kills today... yet.

Upcoming Events

- Weekly DarkSpace
11/02/24 +1.8 Days

Search

Anniversaries

23th - Starfleet.
8th - Cyber999

Social Media

Why not join us on Discord for a chat, or follow us on Twitter or Facebook for more information and fan updates?

Network

DarkSpace
DarkSpace - Beta
Palestar

[FAQ
Forum Index » » Beta Testing Discussion » » suggestion to mirving
 Author suggestion to mirving
| Dark Hiigaran |
Chief Marshal

Joined: July 07, 2007
Posts: 426
From: Slovenia (Europe)
Posted: 2008-09-04 09:34   
well this is bugging alrdy for a long time and some times i can't even sleep.... making bombing difficult by reduced bomb damage won't stop Mirv.. we get 3 bombers with the supply and we press farm the whole MV u probably figured what i mean by now the only way to reduced mirving is by LOWERING THE PRESS we get example: at MV we get about 80 press fro full mirved planet if at 1.500 we get only 20 from mirving and 30 or more from neut no one will even say a mirv bomb ever again.

thanks


awww feel better now /me gets some sleep now
_________________


  Email | Dark Hiigaran |
Eledore Massis [R33]
Grand Admiral
Templar Knights


Joined: May 26, 2002
Posts: 2694
From: tsohlacoLocalhost
Posted: 2008-09-04 09:44   

  • neuting earns more seems a good idea but how to do it, you only kill population. when mirving you destroy more so should have more points. and gives the reason to build planets again.

  • even if you have 5 bombers and 2 supplies. they won't be able to level a complete planet (if constructed well) in one run. heck i doubt they can in three runs.
    To take a 5 planet cluster would take like a hour, more than enough time for the enemy to muster defenses or go on the counter offensive.

  • o and there not reducing the bomb damage, just the blast range. no longer will you be able to destroy a planet in one run. you will destroy the structure targeted and the buildings directly around it.


p.s. current beta bombing is not working properly.
_________________
DS Discordion

BackSlash
Marshal
Galactic Navy


Joined: March 23, 2003
Posts: 11183
From: Bristol, England
Posted: 2008-09-04 09:51   
3 bombers and a supply required to nuke a planet slowly is exactly what kind of thing we want. That requires team play, and gives the enemy a chance to respond. Giving more chance for combat to evolve - which is the main selling point of the game.
_________________


The Master Debator
Cadet

Joined: July 03, 2008
Posts: 114
Posted: 2008-09-04 15:07   
Quote:

On 2008-09-04 09:51, BackSlash *Jack* wrote:
3 bombers and a supply required to nuke a planet slowly is exactly what kind of thing we want. That requires team play, and gives the enemy a chance to respond. Giving more chance for combat to evolve - which is the main selling point of the game.




you wont see FS's 5 ecm extractors coming
_________________
I'm not even angry.

Bardiche
Chief Marshal

Joined: November 16, 2006
Posts: 1247
Posted: 2008-09-04 16:36   
How much hours should players need to take a planet down with about 8 players working on it and no opposition?

How much hours should players need to take a planet down with about 8 players working on it and some opposition, about three enemy vessels?

IE: how long should taking over a planet take conform the new ideals of bombing?
_________________


BackSlash
Marshal
Galactic Navy


Joined: March 23, 2003
Posts: 11183
From: Bristol, England
Posted: 2008-09-05 07:50   
Quote:

On 2008-09-04 15:07, Fatal Sensation wrote:
Quote:

On 2008-09-04 09:51, BackSlash *Jack* wrote:
3 bombers and a supply required to nuke a planet slowly is exactly what kind of thing we want. That requires team play, and gives the enemy a chance to respond. Giving more chance for combat to evolve - which is the main selling point of the game.




you wont see FS's 5 ecm extractors coming




Extractors in 1.5 can't fit an abundance of ECM - I also think you'll find that 5 ECM extractors, a supply and a bomber is a reasonable amount of people to bomb with. Added onto that, trying to bomb a planet with a single bomber, is going to take some time.
_________________


Tommas [ USF HunnyBunny ]
Chief Marshal
Pitch Black


Joined: February 04, 2006
Posts: 581
From: Norway
Posted: 2008-09-05 08:42   
even so, if it needs 3-4 or more to mirv one planet, as ive understand it the amount of pres will be shared, so it wont get much pres per person?

And the other point is that this will take away those "solo bombers" that can pretty much mirv system after system in no time. As you mentioned u need 4 or more to bomb it fast.
_________________


Page created in 0.010956 seconds.


Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Palestar Inc. All rights reserved worldwide.
Terms of use - DarkSpace is a Registered Trademark of PALESTAR