Welcome aboard Visitor...

Daily Screenshot

Server Costs Target


0% of target met.

Latest Topics

- I will no longer be hosting this server »
- Anyone still playing from a decade ago or longer? »
- Game still active. NICE! »
- help me »
- Password resett »
- Darkspace Idea/Opinion Submission Thread »
- Rank Bug maybe? »
- Next patch .... »
- Nobody will remember me...but. »
- 22 years...asking for help from one community to another »

Development Blog

- Roadmap »
- Hello strangers, it’s been a while... »
- State of DarkSpace Development »
- Potential planetary interdictor changes! »
- The Silent Cartographer »

Combat Kills

Combat kills in last 24 hours:
No kills today... yet.

Upcoming Events

- Weekly DarkSpace
11/02/24 +1.8 Days

Search

Anniversaries

23th - Starfleet.
8th - Cyber999

Social Media

Why not join us on Discord for a chat, or follow us on Twitter or Facebook for more information and fan updates?

Network

DarkSpace
DarkSpace - Beta
Palestar

[FAQ
Forum Index » » Beta Testing Discussion » » The Return of Long Range Cloud bombing part DEUX (ICC)
Goto page ( 1 | 2 Next Page )
 Author The Return of Long Range Cloud bombing part DEUX (ICC)
Ramius
Fleet Admiral
Agents

Joined: January 12, 2002
Posts: 894
From: Ramius
Posted: 2005-07-04 19:42   
Hola amigos.


The same test is administered with level 8 bombers. With a stock command carrier, you are able to launch 5 volleys of 6 for 30 fighters.


The result:



Meaning that ICC bombers are slightly more effective than UGTO.


However...

Notice anything interesting about the command carrier?

Maybe this will help:



That's right, you can equip a reload bay.

The last test, was administered with a level 2 hypermass accelerator and a level 7 reload bay.

This test was also done at the max possible range as seen below:



With these new upgrades, the command carrier is able to launch 8 volleys x 6 fighters for a total of 48 bombers. Far more than the Agincourt.

The result? Well...



Please make your own judgements.



(Sirius 3 started at 100% shields in both tests.)

_________________


  Email Ramius
JRE
Grand Admiral

Joined: August 14, 2003
Posts: 571
Posted: 2005-07-04 20:35   
In my oppinion a reload ON a bomber is rather, an overkill?
Just think, one person could do that and turn around for another run and destroy the planet(not literally). A planet should be able to defend itself against at least ONE ship you would think.


Edited for my ignorance.

[ This Message was edited by: JRE on 2005-07-04 23:31 ]
_________________


Thorium
Grand Admiral

Joined: August 05, 2004
Posts: 185
Posted: 2005-07-04 21:01   
all the factions have a bomber with a reload

i want to see what happens to a planet with no shields....
_________________


Coeus {NCX-Charger}
Admiral, I can't read,
Sundered Weimeriners


Joined: February 16, 2004
Posts: 3635
From: South Philly
Posted: 2005-07-04 21:16   
Complete & utter destruction =P
_________________


Darkspace: Twilight

  Goto the website of Coeus {NCX-Charger}
Koda
Marshal
Fatal Squadron


Joined: August 29, 2002
Posts: 1384
Posted: 2005-07-04 21:44   
Quote:

On 2005-07-04 20:35, JRE wrote:
In my oppinion a reload ON a bomber is rather, an overkill? O wait maybe the phrase im looking for is non-balanced? Or, I dun know just doesnt seem right the icc have the only bomber capable of equiping a reload.

Just think, one person could do that and turn around for another run and destroy the planet(not literally). A planet should be able to defend itself against at least ONE ship you would think.





Dude, no offense intended but you know that style of ship has been with the UGTO as the Command Dread (CD) for many Years now. I think its Silly but if Any Faction Deserves to get a Reload on its Command ship.. Dont you think its the Bomber/Defense Faction? (The ICC..)

Plus what does that say about this game if you take it away from us now... "Well sorry guys.. we thought we Nerf this cus the Ugto have been using that Strategy for Too many years already.."

-Charz



[ This Message was edited by: CharAznable on 2005-07-04 21:47 ]
_________________






Maskerade
Grand Admiral
Galactic Navy


Joined: March 21, 2002
Posts: 638
From: Canada
Posted: 2005-07-04 23:17   
nah, it's just eh UGTO cleverly diverted attention from the CD by creating a crusade againt the adv carrier.

_________________
- Maskerade

JRE
Grand Admiral

Joined: August 14, 2003
Posts: 571
Posted: 2005-07-04 23:30   
Sry didnt realize that all factions bombers had reloads. I just think one ship shouldnt be able to destroy a planet. And pls dont bring up the AC.
_________________


Ramius
Fleet Admiral
Agents

Joined: January 12, 2002
Posts: 894
From: Ramius
Posted: 2005-07-05 00:19   
How many fighter slots does the CD have?


Edit:

UGTO command dread has 4 fighter bays.

Brood has 4.




[ This Message was edited by: Ramius on 2005-07-05 00:26 ]
_________________


  Email Ramius
Trekkie_zero
Cadet

Joined: October 14, 2003
Posts: 146
From: A state with too many A\'s....
Posted: 2005-07-05 01:31   
Well your talking about fighter bombing arent you not actually using the mirv bombs or were using them along side the XB-11s?
_________________


Ramius
Fleet Admiral
Agents

Joined: January 12, 2002
Posts: 894
From: Ramius
Posted: 2005-07-05 02:32   
This was strictly bombing with fighters, I'm sure if the CC began a conventional bomb run once it hit dictor range, it would have penetrated shields.
_________________


  Email Ramius
Mithrandir
Chief Marshal

Joined: October 22, 2001
Posts: 1276
Posted: 2005-07-05 02:54   
Quote:
Plus what does that say about this game if you take it away from us now... "Well sorry guys.. we thought we Nerf this cus the Ugto have been using that Strategy for Too many years already.."



I fail to see the point. Why can't we remove something that's been around for a while? We had a few typos in the game, and those have been fixed. We had PCMs that were used for bombing, and those are now ship-to-ship weapons. We had Gaifen that gave you ships damaged points, and they now are nearly extinct. We had planetary transports and people used them for supply line disruptions and ships damaged prestige for a year - and we removed them.

It seems to me these are the sorts of things that can be changed - namely, anything. If we retool all the ships, I don't see why we can't remove a gadget that may have been present for a few years. Not to say that we should or need to (not passing judgement at all), but I don't see a problem with doing so, in general.

Otherwise, most of the ships have had the layouts they do in release for years - and yet most of them are now changed... does that say something about the game?
_________________


  Email Mithrandir
Koda
Marshal
Fatal Squadron


Joined: August 29, 2002
Posts: 1384
Posted: 2005-07-05 05:24   
Yeah I see where your going.. Ie: the game is changeing but staying the same..

But Mith, there comes a point in ones DS career when they can draw the line and say thats it and no more.. why did they get this and not me. To say that the Dev of then gave the none bomber faction an uber bomber is not, nor has it ever been my soap box. Nor is it my intention of saying you dont have the powers to deal out change as you see fit. But what I do take a stand for is pointing out certian things ..this isnt a case of spelling but a factor of unfair treatment. And on this matter I do beleive that giving all three factions this ability goes along way towards reciprocity.

I do fully understand that taking out and adding certain aspects is the nature of yours and of others positions here at Palestar. But my nature is that of a consumer and player of DS. I would have takken the removal of that feature to be a kin to a kick in the shorts.

-Charz
_________________






BackSlash
Marshal
Galactic Navy


Joined: March 23, 2003
Posts: 11183
From: Bristol, England
Posted: 2005-07-05 16:04   
Remember, this is a team game, one ship isnt supposed to be able to take a planet.
_________________


Nim *
Chief Marshal
Courageous Elite Commandos


Joined: September 05, 2004
Posts: 295
Posted: 2005-07-05 20:32   
Someone said u cant replace builds with reloads although dunno how accurate this info is.
_________________


Dwarden
Admiral
CHIMERA

Joined: June 07, 2001
Posts: 1072
From: Czech Republic
Posted: 2005-07-06 12:58   
any type of offensive ships shoud NEVER have reload gadget ...

end of story ...
_________________
... Ideas? ... that's Ocean w/o borders !

Goto page ( 1 | 2 Next Page )
Page created in 0.029046 seconds.


Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Palestar Inc. All rights reserved worldwide.
Terms of use - DarkSpace is a Registered Trademark of PALESTAR