Welcome aboard Visitor...

Daily Screenshot

Server Costs Target


84% of target met.

Latest Topics

- so i talked with Massi »
- See Commands »
- Now the fun begins »
- Qand answers have returned »
- Call to Arms »
- All Species 8572 Report in »
- hi there »
- Anyone still playing from a decade ago or longer? »
- Game still active. NICE! »
- help me »

Development Blog

- Roadmap »
- Hello strangers, it’s been a while... »
- State of DarkSpace Development »
- Potential planetary interdictor changes! »
- The Silent Cartographer »

Combat Kills

Combat kills in last 24 hours:
No kills today... yet.

Upcoming Events

- Weekly DarkSpace
11/23/24 +21.0 Hours

Search

Anniversaries

No anniversaries today.

Social Media

Why not join us on Discord for a chat, or follow us on Twitter or Facebook for more information and fan updates?

Network

DarkSpace
DarkSpace - Beta
Palestar

[FAQ
Forum Index » » Developer Feedback » » [Suggestion] Planet Locks
 Author [Suggestion] Planet Locks
RageMastaFlex
Fleet Admiral

Joined: August 16, 2006
Posts: 11
From: Oregon
Posted: 2010-04-27 22:17   
I believe that planet locks should be based on Construction points, and not Rank.

I say this because several times now, I've had my planets "Taken away" by players with higher rank, and less understanding of how construction works.

I have 7k construction, and I constantly see higher ranked players locking my planets, with 2 or 3 or 4k Construction.

Its starting to get rather annoying. So, I believe that locks should be based on the construction points. Unfortunatly I realize that even that would not fix the major problem here... But I think it would help.

This is just an idea, feedback is appreciated. Thankyou.
_________________


  Email RageMastaFlex
Challenger
Marshal

Joined: March 28, 2002
Posts: 886
Posted: 2010-04-27 22:24   
Doesnt sound like a horrible idea. I cannot think clearly enough right now to come up with any cons to the point made.

Anyone have any?
_________________


  Email Challenger
Chewy Squirrel
Chief Marshal

Joined: January 27, 2003
Posts: 304
From: NYC
Posted: 2010-04-27 22:29   
Quote:

On 2010-04-27 22:24, *Challenger* wrote:
Doesnt sound like a horrible idea. I cannot think clearly enough right now to come up with any cons to the point made.

Anyone have any?




Just one- that Marshals would no longer have any benefit whatsoever . Other than that it sounds good.
_________________


RageMastaFlex
Fleet Admiral

Joined: August 16, 2006
Posts: 11
From: Oregon
Posted: 2010-04-27 22:57   
by the time they get to marshal... they should have more in every catagory... then ANYONE esle.
_________________


  Email RageMastaFlex
Starcommander
Marshal

Joined: December 14, 2005
Posts: 579
From: In your base, stealing your cookies
Posted: 2010-04-27 23:01   
would also like to see a Locked By in the F3 amongst the planets details. This way we can know who locked it and generally know who built it. Then we can approach the person who did it and give them tips and so on if the build was good but could use work.

The other idea is to have a sign by or sig of the person who built the planet. So if you liked how you made it you can sign it showing all that look at it in F3 (even enemy's when they do cap the planet) that THIS was your handy work.


On topic, I am all for this locking system.
_________________


WH 40k armies, Grey Knights, Dark Angles, Imperial Guard (Vostroyan First Born) and Orks.

There is a thin line between knowing when to give up and when to try harder.

  Email Starcommander
Page created in 0.008777 seconds.


Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Palestar Inc. All rights reserved worldwide.
Terms of use - DarkSpace is a Registered Trademark of PALESTAR