Welcome aboard Visitor...

Daily Screenshot

Server Costs Target


84% of target met.

Latest Topics

- so i talked with Massi »
- See Commands »
- Now the fun begins »
- Qand answers have returned »
- Call to Arms »
- All Species 8572 Report in »
- hi there »
- Anyone still playing from a decade ago or longer? »
- Game still active. NICE! »
- help me »

Development Blog

- Roadmap »
- Hello strangers, it’s been a while... »
- State of DarkSpace Development »
- Potential planetary interdictor changes! »
- The Silent Cartographer »

Combat Kills

Combat kills in last 24 hours:
No kills today... yet.

Upcoming Events

- Weekly DarkSpace
11/23/24 +21.8 Hours

Search

Anniversaries

No anniversaries today.

Social Media

Why not join us on Discord for a chat, or follow us on Twitter or Facebook for more information and fan updates?

Network

DarkSpace
DarkSpace - Beta
Palestar

[FAQ
Forum Index » » Developer Feedback » » Another Idea...
 Author Another Idea...
Supertrooper
Marshal
Pitch Black


Joined: March 18, 2004
Posts: 1895
From: Maryland, U.S.A
Posted: 2006-06-28 04:10   
Well, rather simple here.. Take away the planets ability to reload a ship without a depot. Why do this you ask? To slow down solo bombing. This way it will either take a Command Class Dread (Something that was ment to hold it's own bombing in enemy territory), or a fleet with an engineer to be able to reload and continue on. It will make it take longer to capture enemy systems using Mirvs, Fighter Bombers, Or Tele-Kenetik Bombs.
Debate over this I geuss, or flame it to hell..

-Crim
_________________


  Email Supertrooper
Fattierob
Vice Admiral

Joined: April 25, 2003
Posts: 4059
Posted: 2006-06-28 19:09   
Without a depot, the only thing that should be reloaded is JD fuel, if the planet has Hydrogen.

Otherwise, anything else is just wrong.
_________________


Obiwan Kenobi
Grand Admiral

Joined: January 14, 2005
Posts: 99
From: Mooresboro , North Carolina United States
Posted: 2006-08-28 15:07   
well in its current state you can orbit a planet and for every 10 seconds in orbit you gain ammo and fuel...i dont think this should be, perhaps the fuel but not ammo

_________________
Do or Do Not, There is no Try.

  Email Obiwan Kenobi
GothThug {C?}
Fleet Admiral

Joined: June 29, 2005
Posts: 2932
Posted: 2006-09-02 04:35   
oh sure make this game more difficult than it already is ugh
_________________


  Email GothThug {C?}
Sixkiller
Marshal
Courageous Elite Commandos


Joined: May 11, 2005
Posts: 1786
From: Netherlands
Posted: 2006-09-02 15:30   
difficult?
/me tries to reproduce that thought but fails horribly
_________________



YIIMM
Grand Admiral

Joined: June 16, 2005
Posts: 851
From: Barcino, Hispania Tarraconensis
Posted: 2006-09-05 10:23   
Quote:

On 2006-09-02 04:35, Twisted GothThug {C?} wrote:
oh sure make this game more difficult than it already is ugh



I'm sure giving Defence Bases core weapons doesn't fit into that category, hmm?
_________________


Smartin
Grand Admiral

Joined: August 04, 2005
Posts: 1107
From: Michigan
Posted: 2006-09-05 11:51   
Quote:

On 2006-09-05 10:23, YIIMM wrote:
Quote:

On 2006-09-02 04:35, Twisted GothThug {C?} wrote:
oh sure make this game more difficult than it already is ugh



I'm sure giving Defence Bases core weapons doesn't fit into that category, hmm?




owned.
_________________


DarkSpace Community Website

  Email Smartin
Supertrooper
Marshal
Pitch Black


Joined: March 18, 2004
Posts: 1895
From: Maryland, U.S.A
Posted: 2006-09-05 14:36   
Quote:

On 2006-09-02 04:35, Twisted GothThug {C?} wrote:
oh sure make this game more difficult than it already is ugh


Only one it seems to be difficult for is you, so be quiet.

Now.. I think that removing the planets ability wouldnt hurt the game, and would encourage teamplay (Combat Supplies 4tw!).
_________________


  Email Supertrooper
Binks
1st Rear Admiral

Joined: November 28, 2003
Posts: 469
Posted: 2006-09-05 18:20   
Well It does make sense for a planet to resupply ships in orbit, seeing as how they'd be recieving supplies regurally and shuttling them up to orbiting ships.

On the other hand I'm all for forcing more supply ships to be on the battlefield. The one problem I see here is that people will just throw a single depot on a planet and bingo, nothing's changed.

I'm gonna go out on a limb here and take this to the extreme, no planet reloading except (if possible) the three main systems. I'm not a hundred percent sure this is a good idea but I can't see any problems with it at first glance, every attack force would be forced to pack a supply ship of some kind and defend it, rather than just capturing planets for resupply...
_________________
Midshipmen still need Engineering or Supply Ships

Powered by Stormtroopers and Red Shirts

Sixkiller
Marshal
Courageous Elite Commandos


Joined: May 11, 2005
Posts: 1786
From: Netherlands
Posted: 2006-09-06 04:14   
only planets with a hub (thus planet that are alive) should be resupplying fuel and ammo, because those planets would get deliveries with fuel and ammo.
_________________



Fattierob
Vice Admiral

Joined: April 25, 2003
Posts: 4059
Posted: 2006-09-10 14:56   
Quote:

On 2006-09-06 04:14, Sixkiller wrote:
only planets with a hub (thus planet that are alive) should be resupplying fuel and ammo, because those planets would get deliveries with fuel and ammo.




that actually makes a whole lot of sense
_________________


Enterprise
Chief Marshal
Raven Warriors

Joined: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2576
From: Hawthorne, Nevada
Posted: 2006-09-17 02:11   
Make the requirements be to reload fuel:

Planet must have hydrogen in its atmostphere / OR / Contains a hub, a starport, and a depot.

To reload weapons, the planet must be:

Not Barren, has at least 2 factorys, a starport, a hub, 2 deports.

Hello forcing supplies on the battlefield, goodbye soloing.




-Ent
_________________


Page created in 0.029603 seconds.


Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Palestar Inc. All rights reserved worldwide.
Terms of use - DarkSpace is a Registered Trademark of PALESTAR