Author |
Darkspace manual... |
Fluttershy Fleet Admiral
Joined: September 24, 2011 Posts: 778 From: Fluttershy
| Posted: 2012-07-23 13:31  
Misinformation, bad spelling, lore that makes no sense, incomplete or uninformative descriptions, info that doesn't apply anymore...
Is there any way we can help update and tidy the manual up? It's just terrible.
There doesn't even need to be a weapon damage mentioned because it's completely irrelevent since UGTO, ICC, and K'Luth defenses and weapons all behave differently.
And what's this about a weapon range being 120~230?
And beacons being used to help track down enemys who retreat? How? It doesn't mark a target for attack, all it does is raise signature a little, which is about as useful as flying in circles.
_________________
|
Fattierob Vice Admiral
Joined: April 25, 2003 Posts: 4059
| Posted: 2012-07-23 13:42  
Quote:
|
On 2012-07-23 13:31, Fluttershy wrote:
Misinformation, bad spelling, lore that makes no sense, incomplete or uninformative descriptions, info that doesn't apply anymore...
Is there any way we can help update and tidy the manual up? It's just terrible.
|
|
Copy it onto the Wiki (if it's not already) and start editing it there?
Quote:
|
There doesn't even need to be a weapon damage mentioned because it's completely irrelevent since UGTO, ICC, and K'Luth defenses and weapons all behave differently.
And what's this about a weapon range being 120~230?
And beacons being used to help track down enemys who retreat? How? It doesn't mark a target for attack, all it does is raise signature a little, which is about as useful as flying in circles.
|
|
http://darkspace.net/index.htm?module=document.php&doc_id=1&chap_id=310&chap_name=14
Quote:
|
o 10/14/08 - Updated Manual for 1.500 - Doran
|
|
Some things have changed since then, I would surmise.
_________________
|
Fluttershy Fleet Admiral
Joined: September 24, 2011 Posts: 778 From: Fluttershy
| Posted: 2012-07-23 13:51  
4 years out of date? wow
Perhaps the manual should just be replaced with the wiki, or modified to allow direct edits by trusted users.
The manual is the first thing people are looking at, and I've heard newbies mentioning or following stuff that no longer applies.
_________________
|
Mylith Grand Admiral Faster than Light
Joined: July 19, 2011 Posts: 507 From: Hivarin, CD+36*15693
| Posted: 2012-07-23 14:08  
I agree. Manual should be archived(not removed) and replaced by the wiki.
_________________
http://twitter.com/DarkSpace7
|
Walrus of Apathy Admiral Templar Knights
Joined: August 07, 2005 Posts: 466 From: Dorans Basement
| Posted: 2012-07-23 14:38  
The wiki has always been meant to replace the manual, the only problem being that the Wiki is entrely user created and its been getting very little attention sadly so parts of it are still either incorrect or uncomplete.
I beg anyone who has time and knows what they're talking about to take a look at the wiki and help it out a bit, it still needs work.
_________________
|
Hakketak Grand Admiral
Joined: March 24, 2009 Posts: 301
| Posted: 2012-07-23 17:30  
i have time...but the "know what ur talking about" may be difficult at some parts:) the "game mechanics" and wiki should be coupled in one thread in the forums named "new persons check here" entry
_________________ "I shouldn't be alive"
|
Forger of Destiny Chief Marshal We Kick Arse
Joined: October 10, 2009 Posts: 826
| Posted: 2012-07-24 04:13  
ill go through the game mechanics thread and put info from it onto the wiki.
_________________ Forging legends and lives outside till naught remains inside.
|