Welcome aboard Visitor...

Daily Screenshot

Server Costs Target


84% of target met.

Latest Topics

- so i talked with Massi »
- See Commands »
- Now the fun begins »
- Qand answers have returned »
- Call to Arms »
- All Species 8572 Report in »
- hi there »
- Anyone still playing from a decade ago or longer? »
- Game still active. NICE! »
- help me »

Development Blog

- Roadmap »
- Hello strangers, it’s been a while... »
- State of DarkSpace Development »
- Potential planetary interdictor changes! »
- The Silent Cartographer »

Combat Kills

Combat kills in last 24 hours:
No kills today... yet.

Upcoming Events

- Weekly DarkSpace
11/23/24 +20.5 Hours

Search

Anniversaries

No anniversaries today.

Social Media

Why not join us on Discord for a chat, or follow us on Twitter or Facebook for more information and fan updates?

Network

DarkSpace
DarkSpace - Beta
Palestar

[FAQ
Forum Index » » English (General) » » Plasma or Psi?
Goto page ( 1 | 2 Next Page )
 Author Plasma or Psi?
Critus
Chief Marshal

Joined: December 28, 2007
Posts: 52
From: kpo8914
Posted: 2012-04-06 13:02   
Hi people, i have a question plasma or psi?. Is plasma more dmg, more hull dmg and less to armor?
_________________


DiepLuc
Chief Marshal

Joined: March 23, 2010
Posts: 1187
Posted: 2012-04-06 13:49   
4.2.1 Standard Cannons has some obsolete information.
  • Each shot of plasma causes more damage than each shot of PSI.
  • Total 5 shots in a PSI volley causes more damage than total 3 shots in a Plasma volley.
  • PSI shot speed is much faster than Plasma.
  • PSI and Plasma both have falloff. PSI range is farther than Plasma.
  • PSI recharges more slowly than Plasma does. Plasma drains more energy than PSI.

Clearly, PSI is better in all situation. Stick with it.

Plasma would be better PSI against small ships only when it doesn't have falloff and its speed is faster than PSI.
[ This Message was edited by: chlorophyll on 2012-04-06 13:52 ]
_________________


Admiral C. Wilson
Admiral

Joined: July 06, 2010
Posts: 262
From: Arkansas
Posted: 2012-04-06 13:51   
PSI all the way
_________________
Well boys it looks like we'll be home in time for coffee and donuts.
-Admiral Ricky Chance Wilson

  Email Admiral C. Wilson
Critus
Chief Marshal

Joined: December 28, 2007
Posts: 52
From: kpo8914
Posted: 2012-04-06 13:58   
Ty!
_________________


[ML]RogueAvengerTTV
Marshal

Joined: September 11, 2010
Posts: 300
From: England
Posted: 2012-04-06 14:41   
All i saw was psi D:
_________________


  Email [ML]RogueAvengerTTV
Eledore Massis [R33]
Grand Admiral
Templar Knights


Joined: May 26, 2002
Posts: 2695
From: tsohlacoLocalhost
Posted: 2012-04-06 14:50   
Some incorrect information in here:
Quote:
On 2012-04-06 13:49, chlorophyll wrote:
  • Each shot of plasma causes more damage than each shot of PSI.
  • Total 5 shots in a PSI volley causes more damage than total 3 shots in a Plasma volley.
  • PSI shot speed is much faster than Plasma.
  • PSI and Plasma both have falloff. PSI range is farther than Plasma.
  • PSI recharges more slowly than Plasma does. Plasma drains more energy than PSI.

Plasma would be better PSI against small ships only when it doesn't have falloff and its speed is faster than PSI.


PSI has 5 projectiles and in total it does More damage then 3 Plasma projectiles at 0 gu Range.
PSI has 220Gu/s speed v/s the Plasma at 160Gu/s speed.
PSI has 660 Gu range v/s the Plasma at 640 Gu range.
PSI has Falloff v/s the Plasma that has No Falloff.
At Cruiser level (5).
A PSI recharges in 3.4 seconds. Plasma in 2.2 seconds.
A PSI uses 0.47 units of energy per recharge. Plasma uses 0.35 units of energy per recharge.(Heavy cannon is double this value)

When to use Plasma?
When you feel like shooting stuff at a range but it won't be able to dodge your slower fire. a corvette or frigate shooting at dreads for example.

E.
_________________
DS Discordion

Critus
Chief Marshal

Joined: December 28, 2007
Posts: 52
From: kpo8914
Posted: 2012-04-06 16:36   
Nice answer. Now...
Whats falloff? in case i want to deal heavy close range dmg plasma is better then? is for a mandi, psi es not bad but my mandi is wep multiplex modded so iam looking for the best firepower i can get.
_________________


Talien
Marshal
Templar Knights


Joined: May 11, 2010
Posts: 2044
From: Michigan
Posted: 2012-04-06 20:17   
Falloff is when damage output decreases over distance, they do more damage up close and less the further away you are. As Eledore pointed out plasma do not have falloff so they'll do the same damage at point blank as they will at max distance. If you want to do point blank engagements then stick with Psi.
_________________
Adapt or die.

Kenny_Naboo
Marshal
Pitch Black


Joined: January 11, 2010
Posts: 3823
From: LobsterTown
Posted: 2012-04-06 21:03   

Now I didn't know that abt the Plasma. Seems like a good fit for ships like the Krill or Gang when engaging stations at range.
_________________
... in space, no one can hear you scream.....


Fluttershy
Fleet Admiral

Joined: September 24, 2011
Posts: 778
From: Fluttershy
Posted: 2012-04-07 02:38   
That weapon info box really does a fantastic job of telling you these things.

Compressed antimatter? Magnetic containment? <- Who cares?
No fall off damage? Damage bonus vs hull? <- That is helpful info.
_________________


-(kha-ti the silent watcher)-
Grand Admiral

Joined: September 12, 2011
Posts: 185
From: the land of silent watchers
Posted: 2012-04-07 13:25   
i've used plasma for the longest time and it's served me well despite being slower so the way i see it is, plasma: slower but hits good at all ranges with a little less energy cost.
_________________


DiepLuc
Chief Marshal

Joined: March 23, 2010
Posts: 1187
Posted: 2012-04-07 21:29   
Quote:
On 2012-04-06 14:50, Eledore Massis [R33] wrote:
Some incorrect information in here:
Quote:
On 2012-04-06 13:49, chlorophyll wrote:
  • PSI and Plasma both have falloff.


PSI has Falloff v/s the Plasma that has No Falloff.


In database, Plasma has no falloff, agree.
But in technical document published by Fattirob, he wrote:
1 PSI = 319 + (54) + {144 +(20)} - [67 + (99)]
1 Plasma = 409 + (33) + {319 + (19)} - [81 + (4)]
where numbers in square bracket are falloff damage. Then I conclude Plasma has falloff as well.
The point is, Plasma falloff is unnoticeable.
At Cruiser level 5
1 PSI damages 3555 @0gu and 745 @660gu
1 Plasma damages 2343 @ 0gu and 2040 @640gu
Btw
Quote:
On 2012-04-06 14:50, Eledore Massis [R33] wrote:
At Cruiser level (5).
A PSI recharges in 3.4 seconds. Plasma in 2.2 seconds.
A PSI uses 0.47 units of energy per recharge. Plasma uses 0.35 units of energy per recharge.


Plasma uses 0.18 unit of energy per second so its cooldown is 0.356/0.18 = 1.97 seconds.
So
Quote:
On 2012-04-06 14:50, Eledore Massis [R33] wrote:
When to use Plasma?
When you feel like shooting stuff at a range but it won't be able to dodge your slower fire. a corvette or frigate shooting at dreads for example.


or in short, Plasma has higher DPS than PSI does.
Although higher DPS results higher energy draining, but often maintaining energy in ships with cannons is not difficult.

This discovery is amazing! Let's all switch to Plasma as its DPS is higher than PSI.
_________________


Kenny_Naboo
Marshal
Pitch Black


Joined: January 11, 2010
Posts: 3823
From: LobsterTown
Posted: 2012-04-08 00:07   

I'd use Plasmas on Krills. Keep the distance.
_________________
... in space, no one can hear you scream.....


Enterprise
Chief Marshal
Raven Warriors

Joined: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2576
From: Hawthorne, Nevada
Posted: 2012-04-08 07:35   
Bear in mind you should only use Plasma if you don't intend on trying to hit anything smaller than a Dreadnaught. Against cruisers you might want to stick to PSI, as your chance to actually hit is more important than overall potential DPS.

Personally, K'luth is a close range faction and as such, prefer Psi Cannons for more reliable accuracy and potentially better damage as close ranges.





-Ent
_________________


Doran
Chief Marshal
Galactic Navy


Joined: March 29, 2003
Posts: 4032
From: The Gideon Unit
Posted: 2012-04-08 08:55   
Quote:

On 2012-04-08 07:35, Enterprise wrote:
Bear in mind you should only use Plasma if you don't intend on trying to hit anything smaller than a Dreadnaught. Against cruisers you might want to stick to PSI, as your chance to actually hit is more important than overall potential DPS.



Really? you mean there are situations in which one weapon ISNT the best all the time? I am shocked, SHOCKED, that a fine upstanding citizen such as Enterprise would DARE suggest that the ability to do the most amount of damage in the shortest amount of time, over time, is somehow any degree LESS important than being able to do any damage at all.
_________________


Goto page ( 1 | 2 Next Page )
Page created in 0.023702 seconds.


Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Palestar Inc. All rights reserved worldwide.
Terms of use - DarkSpace is a Registered Trademark of PALESTAR