Welcome aboard Visitor...

Daily Screenshot

Server Costs Target


84% of target met.

Latest Topics

- so i talked with Massi »
- See Commands »
- Now the fun begins »
- Qand answers have returned »
- Call to Arms »
- All Species 8572 Report in »
- hi there »
- Anyone still playing from a decade ago or longer? »
- Game still active. NICE! »
- help me »

Development Blog

- Roadmap »
- Hello strangers, it’s been a while... »
- State of DarkSpace Development »
- Potential planetary interdictor changes! »
- The Silent Cartographer »

Combat Kills

Combat kills in last 24 hours:
No kills today... yet.

Upcoming Events

- Weekly DarkSpace
11/23/24 +21.4 Hours

Search

Anniversaries

No anniversaries today.

Social Media

Why not join us on Discord for a chat, or follow us on Twitter or Facebook for more information and fan updates?

Network

DarkSpace
DarkSpace - Beta
Palestar

[FAQ
Forum Index » » English (General) » » Slower Smaller Ships
 Author Slower Smaller Ships
Lithium
Chief Marshal

Joined: June 29, 2003
Posts: 109
Posted: 2010-11-01 21:16   
Why smaller ships shouldn't be powerful is ... they're hard to hit because they're small and fast.
If they get weapons and power, they're extremely annoying and invincible in medium-long range battle.

So it should be balanced if smaller ships get slower speed and high damage weapons.

For example.
Assault Destroyer Heavy:
Speed: Same as Dread
Turning Rate: Same as Dread
JD Recharge Time: Same as Dread
Weapons: Same as Assault Cruiser
Armors/Shields: Normal Destroyer
Power: Same as Cruiser

Even with same speed as Dread, it's hard to hit because it's small.
_________________




Shigernafy
Admiral

Joined: May 29, 2001
Posts: 5726
From: The Land of Taxation without Representation
Posted: 2010-11-01 21:35   
Unfortunately, the way speed, turning rate, jd recharge, and to an extent armor/shields and power are set is by hull type. We can't tell an assault destroyer to have more power than a combat destroyer, which has a better turning radius than an escort destroyer, because those variables are determined based on the hull type and the engines mounted. To make it more flexible to allow what you're suggesting would require a complete rewrite of the basic way ships, and to a large extent all nouns in general, work.

I'd personally welcome the added flexibility, though it would potentially complicate things a bit too. But the effort required makes me think it is not terribly likely to happen.
_________________
* [S.W]AdmBito @55321 Sent \"I dunno; the French had a few missteps. But they're on the right track, one headbutt at a time.\"

  Email Shigernafy
Kenny_Naboo
Marshal
Pitch Black


Joined: January 11, 2010
Posts: 3823
From: LobsterTown
Posted: 2010-11-01 22:17   

Just remove weaps levelling. Nuff said.
_________________
... in space, no one can hear you scream.....


Koba
Chief Marshal
Praetorian Wolves


Joined: April 20, 2010
Posts: 309
From: United States of America
Posted: 2010-11-01 22:39   
ok what exactly is weapon leveling?
_________________


Forger of Destiny
Chief Marshal
We Kick Arse


Joined: October 10, 2009
Posts: 826
Posted: 2010-11-01 23:22   
I recommend increasing size of projectiles according to weapon levels. That should make it easier for the cute lil' dreads to hit the small baddie ships.
Quote:

On 2010-11-01 22:39, Aaron[+R] wrote:
ok what exactly is weapon leveling?


Weapon levelling is a system of making larger ship's weapons have an edge over smaller ship's weapons. Example - A v1.544 Beak frigate has two torpedoes, and the age-old v1.520 Piercer interdictor cruiser also has two torpedoes. By weapon levelling, the torpedoes of the piercer are, in comparison to the beak,
[list]
a) more damaging
b) longer ranged (removed as of 1.525~)
c) more energy-hungry
d) slow-charging
e) larger splash damage
f) lower in ammo
_________________
Forging legends and lives outside till naught remains inside.


Kenny_Naboo
Marshal
Pitch Black


Joined: January 11, 2010
Posts: 3823
From: LobsterTown
Posted: 2010-11-02 00:07   
By removing weaps levelling, 2 dessies might have firepower equivalent to a single dread.... since all weaps are equal and larger ships carry a larger number of them.

Right now, the way I see it, smaller ships are way disadvantaged because they have less weapons, and each of those weaps are way less powerful.... nevermind their faster ROF.

We shd simply classify weapons by their tiers... ie. Disruptor & Assault Disruptor... IT missile & IT Missile Mk 2.
_________________
... in space, no one can hear you scream.....


SpaceAdmiral
Grand Admiral

Joined: May 05, 2010
Posts: 1005
Posted: 2010-11-02 01:25   
I've heard their faster RoF makes it have a higher damage over time. So small ships will win through will power, and big ships can slug each other fast and hard.
_________________


Page created in 0.014584 seconds.


Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Palestar Inc. All rights reserved worldwide.
Terms of use - DarkSpace is a Registered Trademark of PALESTAR