Welcome aboard Visitor...

Daily Screenshot

Server Costs Target


84% of target met.

Latest Topics

- so i talked with Massi »
- See Commands »
- Now the fun begins »
- Qand answers have returned »
- Call to Arms »
- All Species 8572 Report in »
- hi there »
- Anyone still playing from a decade ago or longer? »
- Game still active. NICE! »
- help me »

Development Blog

- Roadmap »
- Hello strangers, it’s been a while... »
- State of DarkSpace Development »
- Potential planetary interdictor changes! »
- The Silent Cartographer »

Combat Kills

Combat kills in last 24 hours:
No kills today... yet.

Upcoming Events

- Weekly DarkSpace
11/23/24 +21.6 Hours

Search

Anniversaries

No anniversaries today.

Social Media

Why not join us on Discord for a chat, or follow us on Twitter or Facebook for more information and fan updates?

Network

DarkSpace
DarkSpace - Beta
Palestar

[FAQ
Forum Index » » English (General) » » UGTO
Goto page ( 1 | 2 Next Page )
 Author UGTO
Lark of Serenity
Grand Admiral
Raven Warriors

Joined: June 02, 2002
Posts: 2516
Posted: 2010-06-20 16:58   
EAD needs an additional fore armour

picket dessie needs more beams, possibly a second generator.

BD energy drain is 0 with all cannons going, its a bit scary
_________________
Admiral Larky, The Wolf
Don't play with fire, play with Larky.
Raven Division Command - 1st Division


Rebellion
Marshal
Faster than Light


Joined: June 20, 2009
Posts: 730
From: sol
Posted: 2010-06-20 17:01   
Quote:

On 2010-06-20 16:58, Lark of Serenity wrote:
EAD needs an additional fore armour





i beg to differ it has plenty it can servive a AD frontal attack for some time
_________________

\"War does not decide who is right, but who is left\"
\"I stopped fighting my inner demons we're on the same side now\"

Pyruvic
Fleet Admiral
Interstellar Cultural Confederation United


Joined: May 30, 2005
Posts: 18
From: CST - USA
Posted: 2010-06-20 17:04   
Psssh, ICC CD needs better arcs. I mean, seriously, who ever actually manages to shoot off their missiles in combat?
_________________


Lark of Serenity
Grand Admiral
Raven Warriors

Joined: June 02, 2002
Posts: 2516
Posted: 2010-06-20 17:04   
my experience was that the AD could rotate shields to fore and last longer than the EAD, which was problematic because the EAD is a fore-firing ship and loses its edge when it has to turn to keep damage off the front.
_________________
Admiral Larky, The Wolf
Don't play with fire, play with Larky.
Raven Division Command - 1st Division


-Daedalus-
Grand Admiral

Joined: September 26, 2006
Posts: 549
Posted: 2010-06-20 17:21   
ICC AC needs the full armor/shields on the rear.
_________________


Rebellion
Marshal
Faster than Light


Joined: June 20, 2009
Posts: 730
From: sol
Posted: 2010-06-20 17:38   
Quote:

On 2010-06-20 17:04, Lark of Serenity wrote:
my experience was that the AD could rotate shields to fore and last longer than the EAD, which was problematic because the EAD is a fore-firing ship and loses its edge when it has to turn to keep damage off the front.




true but sheilds are supposed to make us have some type of advantage? am i right? and EAD dose more damage then AD in one alpha so thay may not last as long but thay will do just as much or more damage then an AD even tho a AD may be able to live slightly longer thats cuz it cant do as much damage in one alpha. (i have tested this)

i rest my case EAD vs AD is very balenced if u ask me and it all depend on the Pilot
_________________

\"War does not decide who is right, but who is left\"
\"I stopped fighting my inner demons we're on the same side now\"

BackSlash
Marshal
Galactic Navy


Joined: March 23, 2003
Posts: 11183
From: Bristol, England
Posted: 2010-06-20 17:40   
BD does not have zero energy drain, nor does the EAD need more armour.

The EAD is lacking when compared to the AD, but this does not mean it needs more armour (which would increase it's mass an insane amount making it even slower).
_________________


Borgie
Chief Marshal
Pitch Black


Joined: August 15, 2005
Posts: 2256
From: close by
Posted: 2010-06-20 20:32   
EAD is already an overpowered ship comapired to AD. and you want to give it more armor.. are you outta your mind?
_________________


  Email Borgie
jamesbob
Grand Admiral

Joined: August 22, 2009
Posts: 410
Posted: 2010-06-20 23:58   
Quote:

On 2010-06-20 17:21, Daedalus wrote:
ICC AC needs the full armor/shields on the rear.



excuse me the torp cruiser suffers from the same problem on account of the missing defence modual for WEAPONS
_________________


Great Budda
Fleet Admiral
Pitch Black


Joined: January 01, 2008
Posts: 157
From: Omaha, NE
Posted: 2010-06-21 00:12   
Quote:

On 2010-06-20 23:58, jackbob wrote:

excuse me the torp cruiser suffers from the same problem on account of the missing defence modual for WEAPONS





But isn't this true with all three VA cruisers (Assault, Torpedo, and Scale)?



_________________


jamesbob
Grand Admiral

Joined: August 22, 2009
Posts: 410
Posted: 2010-06-21 00:13   
Quote:

On 2010-06-21 00:12, Great Budda wrote:
Quote:

On 2010-06-20 23:58, jackbob wrote:

excuse me the torp cruiser suffers from the same problem on account of the missing defence modual for WEAPONS





But isn't this true with all three VA cruisers (Assault, Torpedo, and Scale)?








yes it is yet the guy i origionaly quoted on wants it just on assault cruiser
_________________


DiepLuc
Chief Marshal

Joined: March 23, 2010
Posts: 1187
Posted: 2010-06-21 05:25   
Quote:

On 2010-06-20 16:58, Lark of Serenity wrote:
EAD needs an additional fore armour
picket dessie needs more beams, possibly a second generator.
BD energy drain is 0 with all cannons going, its a bit scary


Lark, your problem is you're a very agressive , extremly furious, incredibly tyrannic, exceedingly ruthless, greatly atrocious, etc. girl! That's all.
_________________


Kaoschan
Fleet Admiral
Interstellar Cultural Confederation United


Joined: October 11, 2008
Posts: 133
From: Germany
Posted: 2010-06-21 05:31   
EAD is fine, AD is fine ...

but i think the CD is a bit ... lets say its arcs are not the best (*wink wink* missiles)
remove them and give it 2-4 normal railgun with 180° instead
_________________
In ICC Shields with Defence Mode we trust!

K'luth Hunter - Recon ~Ping~ Scout - ECCM for the Team, to beat the K'luth!

  Goto the website of Kaoschan
Fornax
Marshal
Raven Warriors

Joined: April 30, 2002
Posts: 906
From: Jacksonville, FL
Posted: 2010-06-21 05:43   
Just like Fighters are always a full arc, Missiles should always be the same too.
_________________


Kaoschan
Fleet Admiral
Interstellar Cultural Confederation United


Joined: October 11, 2008
Posts: 133
From: Germany
Posted: 2010-06-21 06:00   
Quote:

On 2010-06-21 05:43, Fornax wrote:
Just like Fighters are always a full arc, Missiles should always be the same too.



That would make every Missile Ship too powerfull
_________________
In ICC Shields with Defence Mode we trust!

K'luth Hunter - Recon ~Ping~ Scout - ECCM for the Team, to beat the K'luth!

  Goto the website of Kaoschan
Goto page ( 1 | 2 Next Page )
Page created in 0.019461 seconds.


Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Palestar Inc. All rights reserved worldwide.
Terms of use - DarkSpace is a Registered Trademark of PALESTAR