| Author |
IDEA: subStation's |
t500
Marshal
Joined: June 20, 2007
Posts: 188
From: vermont
|  Posted: 2009-10-21 11:31
my idea is to have a new claes of ship.
it is a subStation that can be flown at 1RA.
we will start this special Station for each team.
ICC
has a shield Station that has a shield ark of 500 GU's
pepes:it provides a safe haven for a fleet of ships.
Pros:defends a fleet of ships so that tha do not tack damig well thar sheld Recharg.
con: HI energy drain,low HP, esey to kill wen shelds are down. not made for Combat
k'luth
has a ECM Station that cand drop the sig of ships in rang
Pros: is to mack a place that a ship can hide thith out cluths.
prop: makes -0.0 sig when there is a hi ecem presents.
con: HI energy drain can hold ecm for 4-5 minutes!! not made for Combat
ugto
has a eccm Station that i desind to make it a night mare fot kluth to un cloak.
Pros: has a eccm Station that i desind to make it a night mare for kluth to uncloak.
prop: makes a hi sig of 50.0 so that kluth will think twice about doing a hit and run on the ugto
con: HI energy drain can hold eccm for 3-4 minutes. not made for Combat
generic
Barrack Station
much simulr Barracks on planetary, but it trains one type of infantry.
Pros:can Build Cyber infantry.
cons:slow Build spaed,need's Resources,not bilt for combat
Siege Station ICC/UGTO
Built for long rang planetary Siege
Pros: has 3 Planetary Siege Missiles and low sig
con: low on helth
Cyber infantry
Built on Barrack Station
prop:is the only infantry that is infantry built of the planet
cons:has the same helth of infantry but thay have hafe the atack of norml infantry.
[ This Message was edited by: t500*COM* on 2009-10-21 11:33 ]
[ This Message was edited by: t500*COM* on 2009-10-21 11:44 ]
[ This Message was edited by: t500*COM* on 2009-10-21 11:51 ]
[ This Message was edited by: t500*COM* on 2009-10-21 11:52 ]
[ This Message was edited by: t500*COM* on 2009-10-21 11:52 ]
[ This Message was edited by: t500*COM* on 2009-10-21 11:54 ]
_________________
luna nobis providet
|
Doran
Chief Marshal
Galactic Navy
Joined: March 29, 2003
Posts: 4032
From: The Gideon Unit
| Posted: 2009-10-21 11:39
Quote:
|
On 2009-10-21 11:31, t500*COM* wrote:
shael ark
pepes
fleat
tack damig well thar sheld Recharg
engre dran
cand
rang
mack
thith out cluths.
wen thar is a hi eccm pesins
eccm PENIS?
minets!!
i desind
fot kluth
minets
much simulr
spaed
helth
helth hafe atack |
|
pr0-tip, dictionary. seriously.
also, no eccm peen0rz
_________________
|
Sliverine
1st Rear Admiral
Joined: November 23, 2006
Posts: 29
From: Singapore
| Posted: 2009-10-21 11:41
hmmm...assuming that i have interpreted your idea correctly, does your substation class of ships contain any form of weaponry and/or have better health then the average cruiser? Cos if its not any better then a normal cruiser i doubt people wld actually use them...
_________________
|
t500
Marshal
Joined: June 20, 2007
Posts: 188
From: vermont
| Posted: 2009-10-21 11:41
Doran ok maybe you are sum help.
Quote:
|
On 2009-10-21 11:41, fatalerror wrote:
hmmm...assuming that i have interpreted your idea correctly, does your substation class of ships contain any form of weaponry and/or have better health then the average cruiser? Cos if its not any better then a normal cruiser i doubt people wld actually use them...
|
|
thay have PD but not much for ofense weapons.
[ This Message was edited by: t500*COM* on 2009-10-21 11:48 ]
[ This Message was edited by: t500*COM* on 2009-10-21 11:55 ]
_________________
luna nobis providet
|
$yTHe {C?}
Grand Admiral
Sundered Weimeriners
Joined: September 29, 2002
Posts: 1292
From: Arlington, VA
| Posted: 2009-10-21 11:47
The barrack station is an interesting idea, but the rest, if they were to be implemented (read: they wont be) just sound like specialized cruisers to me.
_________________
|
t500
Marshal
Joined: June 20, 2007
Posts: 188
From: vermont
| Posted: 2009-10-21 11:50
Quote:
|
On 2009-10-21 11:47, $yTHe {C?} wrote:
but the rest, if they were to be implemented just sound like specialized cruisers to me.
|
|
subStation is just a name it can change.
_________________
luna nobis providet
|
Azreal
Chief Marshal
Joined: March 14, 2004
Posts: 2816
From: United State of Texas, Houston
| Posted: 2009-10-21 11:56
Sounds like a toy for unsubs that shouldn't be given to me.
_________________
bucket link
|
t500
Marshal
Joined: June 20, 2007
Posts: 188
From: vermont
| Posted: 2009-10-21 12:02
Quote:
|
On 2009-10-21 11:56, Azreal wrote:
Sounds like a toy for unsubs that shouldn't be given to me.
|
|
they are not going to be easy to get.
most will need,Gold Combat,Gold Bomber,Gold Transport,Gold Engineering,
Gold Support and Silver Navigator
_________________
luna nobis providet
|
Azreal
Chief Marshal
Joined: March 14, 2004
Posts: 2816
From: United State of Texas, Houston
| Posted: 2009-10-21 12:28
Quote:
|
On 2009-10-21 11:56, Azreal wrote:
Sounds like a toy for unsubs that shouldn't be given, to me.
|
|
[ This Message was edited by: Azreal on 2009-10-21 12:28 ]
_________________
bucket link
|
Piotr-san
Chief Marshal
*Renegade Space Marines*
Joined: July 18, 2002
Posts: 385
From: Poland
| Posted: 2009-10-21 12:40
I have a better idea , give these to Marshals.
_________________
* LobbyGhost votes [PB]Piotr-San for most likly to be Dems mom
Raptus regaliter
|
Krim {C?}
Marshal
Galactic Navy
Joined: June 24, 2002
Posts: 362
From: Boston MA
| Posted: 2009-10-21 13:15
The only Idea I like out of any of this is the idea of a barracks aboard a ship. Maybe put the barracks on "command" type dreads/stations.
_________________
"Universum est gelu quod atrum , nos es unus verus lux lucis"
GTN - Veneratio est Totus
|
Enterprise
Chief Marshal
Raven Warriors
Joined: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2576
From: Hawthorne, Nevada
| Posted: 2009-10-21 13:23
Why would we add more ships when half the ones we already have are useless?
-Ent
_________________
|
Bardiche
Chief Marshal
Joined: November 16, 2006
Posts: 1247
| Posted: 2009-10-21 14:02
Quote:
|
On 2009-10-21 13:23, Enterprise wrote:
Why would we add more ships when half the ones we already have are useless? |
|
This.
I also mirror the sentiments that 1st RAs don't need a special ship. If you want your Stations, subscribe. The cool things should be reserved for paying players, otherwise there'd be little incentive to pay.
To say nothing of how horrible unbalanced the substations'd be: the UGTO variant would be the least useful, with K'Luth's being the best and ICC second-best.
Giving K'Luth insta-cloak is never a good idea, regardless of how they need to close in on people to actually see them... and ICC getting another shield is far more brutal than UGTO's, which seems specifically geared towards anti-K'Luth combat... which seems to be a trend for suggestions nowadays.
_________________
|
Sops
Marshal
Galactic Navy
Joined: March 07, 2004
Posts: 490
| Posted: 2009-10-21 17:24
Quote:
| it is a subStation that can be flown at 1RA. |
|
That is not a self serving suggestion is it?
Quote:
| ugto
has a eccm Station that i desind to make it a night mare fot kluth to un cloak. |
|
So worthless against the ICC?
Quote:
|
Barrack Station
much simulr Barracks on planetary, but it trains one type of infantry. |
|
It would be so much faster to just grab a transport and find a planet with inf.
Quote:
|
Siege Station ICC/UGTO
Built for long rang planetary Siege |
|
ICC already has ships with Siege missiles, not sure about UGTO
_________________
|
Julian Delphiki
Fleet Admiral
Joined: June 19, 2002
Posts: 171
| Posted: 2009-10-21 17:58
Quote:
|
On 2009-10-21 17:24, Sops wrote:
Quote:
|
Siege Station ICC/UGTO
Built for long rang planetary Siege |
|
ICC already has ships with Siege missiles, not sure about UGTO
|
|
Missile Cruiser can be fitted with 3 PSMs already
_________________
|
English
Deutsch
Nederlands
)
