Welcome aboard Visitor...

Daily Screenshot

Server Costs Target


84% of target met.

Latest Topics

- so i talked with Massi »
- See Commands »
- Now the fun begins »
- Qand answers have returned »
- Call to Arms »
- All Species 8572 Report in »
- hi there »
- Anyone still playing from a decade ago or longer? »
- Game still active. NICE! »
- help me »

Development Blog

- Roadmap »
- Hello strangers, it’s been a while... »
- State of DarkSpace Development »
- Potential planetary interdictor changes! »
- The Silent Cartographer »

Combat Kills

Combat kills in last 24 hours:
No kills today... yet.

Upcoming Events

- Weekly DarkSpace
11/23/24 +20.7 Hours

Search

Anniversaries

No anniversaries today.

Social Media

Why not join us on Discord for a chat, or follow us on Twitter or Facebook for more information and fan updates?

Network

DarkSpace
DarkSpace - Beta
Palestar

[FAQ
Forum Index » » English (General) » » The nerfing of the station
 Author The nerfing of the station
El Guapo
Chief Marshal

Joined: February 24, 2004
Posts: 276
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posted: 2009-06-29 07:26   
Now that I am not in a fleet, I was able to look at the UGTO Support and the ICC Station,

Not sure what they had before, but the UGTO has 8 missle launchers the ICC has 10, the K'luth hive has 4. They all have the same number of heavy beam weapons. Core weapons UGTO and K'luth 4, ICC 2, and the UGTO has a flux.

So how much of a change was made to the ICC and UGTO Support Stations, I know the K'luth hive had about the same number of missle launchers as the UGTO station does now and it lost half, so what was taken off the other stations? How where they nerfed?
_________________


BackSlash
Marshal
Galactic Navy


Joined: March 23, 2003
Posts: 11183
From: Bristol, England
Posted: 2009-06-29 07:32   
Defensive-wise, they were nerfed extremely hard.
_________________


Mersenne Twister
Fleet Admiral

Joined: May 11, 2003
Posts: 1161
From: Sector C Test Labs and Contol Facilities
Posted: 2009-06-29 09:09   
Quote:

On 2009-06-29 07:26, El Guapo wrote:

Core weapons UGTO and K'luth 4, ICC 2, and the UGTO has a flux.


keep in mind that ion cannons fire two shots where qsts and SIs fire just 1, and that kluth stations can cloak, and icc stations have a pulse wave (even if its of dubious usefulness)..

also dont forget that the reload range was reduced quite a bit as well
_________________

I wouldn't screw with it if I were you. The doctor already holds you in poor favor. Messing with this might really fry his shorts.

Tommas [ USF HunnyBunny ]
Chief Marshal
Pitch Black


Joined: February 04, 2006
Posts: 581
From: Norway
Posted: 2009-06-29 10:22   
Im not gona start debating the "who got the biggest gun", but cloak on a station is pretty much useless! it takes about 30-60 secs for it to even cloak/uncloak, and then it the power speed of 5gu and the fact that its HUGE! So pretty much, cloak is useless on stations. Even a noob can search out an station clokaed and kill it.

So i realy hope u dont take that into the calculation on stations.
_________________


Bardiche
Chief Marshal

Joined: November 16, 2006
Posts: 1247
Posted: 2009-06-29 11:20   
Each Station can brave a bunch of Cruisers on its own. I think they're still powerful.
_________________


ADmiraLMaXimus (Bringer of Doom)
Chief Marshal
Praetorian Wolves


Joined: March 09, 2002
Posts: 363
From: Earth
Posted: 2009-06-29 11:49   
the question is valid and was not answered.
what was changed in the icc and ugto stations to balance the removal of half the kluth hive fighter bays for example
i think he wants details and i would lilke to know as well
how did you balance this?

_________________
Revenge Is A Dish Best Served Cold..... It Is Very Cold.... In Space.....



  Email ADmiraLMaXimus (Bringer of Doom)
Enterprise
Chief Marshal
Raven Warriors

Joined: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2576
From: Hawthorne, Nevada
Posted: 2009-06-29 12:59   
K'luth stations have long since seemed rather out of place in a faction designed to be hit and run.

Cloak also tends to be of dubious usefulness for their stations. Something that big can't really hide very well.




-Ent
_________________


Sens [R33]
Admiral

Joined: September 27, 2008
Posts: 1020
From: Edge of th...
Posted: 2009-06-29 13:00   
Quote:

On 2009-06-29 12:59, Enterprise wrote:
K'luth stations have long since seemed rather out of place in a faction designed to be hit and run.

Cloak also tends to be of dubious usefulness for their stations. Something that big can't really hide very well.




-Ent




AMBUSH!
_________________
Proud member of the Order of the Gaifen
Founder and former Club chair of the Shigernafy Fan Club
Co-founder of the Doran Judication Comittee


  Email Sens [R33]
DarkScorpion
Marshal
Sanity Assassins


Joined: September 14, 2004
Posts: 237
From: London England
Posted: 2009-06-29 13:23   
I personaly thing that ballancing stations isnt a easy thing to do when you have to take into account on how factions are ment to be but i dont see why the kluth fighter slots was reduced so much on the support class,but then again the missile slot prob lem if you reduce the types of missiles kluth and ugto can fit to short range missiles and leave icc with there it missiles due to them being a long range faction anyways.

If you realy must nerf support stations remove the fighter bomber option
this would help planets defences a bit more as you could put a one hit death ray on a planet but it will do no good if a support station can sit 4k away and reduce it to nothing make capture of planets a bombers job once more not look at me i got a support/hive/supply station say goodbye to your planet.

_________________



Feralwulf
Grand Admiral

Joined: January 24, 2004
Posts: 1729
From: sitting somewhere drinking beer
Posted: 2009-06-29 15:09   
As I Recall the UGTO Support had 13 Missiles give or take and 6 fighter bays, a handful of useless Torps and P Cannons, and a buttload of Standard Beams.

Now? I dunno really, only fly em to do repairs, but I know that like all other stations, they have Less Firepower but more staying power(can take more beating).

and all three factions have a V Key... UGTO's V key is Flux.
[ This Message was edited by: Feralwulf on 2009-06-29 15:11 ]
_________________
rnrn
Don't mess with old dudes...age and treachery will always overcome youth and skill!

spatula
1st Rear Admiral

Joined: May 28, 2005
Posts: 41
From: 192.168.1.1
Posted: 2009-06-29 18:14   
for icc station, its got shields, which are a huge detractor for a pincushion, have a very slow recharge to begin with and that cant be increased by sups, and cloak on kluth station isnt too bad, its useful for WH because theres no way to know what ships uses a WH if its cloaked, great way to mask numbers before or after an assault.

_________________
[choke]"I find your lack of faith disturbing."[/choke]

  Email spatula
*COMMANDERHAWK*
Chief Marshal
*Renegade Space Marines*


Joined: February 03, 2006
Posts: 260
From: Denver Colorado
Posted: 2009-06-29 20:43   
Quote:

On 2009-06-29 13:23, DarkScorpion wrote:
I personaly thing that ballancing stations isnt a easy thing to do when you have to take into account on how factions are ment to be but i dont see why the kluth fighter slots was reduced so much on the support class,but then again the missile slot prob lem if you reduce the types of missiles kluth and ugto can fit to short range missiles and leave icc with there it missiles due to them being a long range faction anyways.

If you realy must nerf support stations remove the fighter bomber option
this would help planets defences a bit more as you could put a one hit death ray on a planet but it will do no good if a support station can sit 4k away and reduce it to nothing make capture of planets a bombers job once more not look at me i got a support/hive/supply station say goodbye to your planet.



either way even if you remove the bombers off stations ppl will just use agincorts/missle dreads ect to bomb a planet youl still have the same problem except youl have a more mobile platform , so it dosent rly solve anything and your back a squar 1 cause they will just be used in the same way except they can use ecm to hide
_________________
plan A : dont die

plan B : take someone with you



  Email *COMMANDERHAWK*
Winters Rapture
Fleet Admiral
United Nations Space Command


Joined: December 09, 2007
Posts: 355
Posted: 2009-06-30 01:27   
I can't talk for UGTO or kluth station reduction, But I can accuratly say that exleast the ICC Supply Station has had two of its fighter slots removed, And a missle slot or two(never paid much attaention to them).
_________________
Time for revenge. . .

El Guapo
Chief Marshal

Joined: February 24, 2004
Posts: 276
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posted: 2009-07-01 09:41   
So really, who ever it was that did the changes on the stations, please explain what was change on each, I know what exactly was changed out on the Hive, four missle slots. I can also tell you it was able with one support worker or depot hold it's own with a UGTO or ICC support station. Now it has a really hard time with two cruiser, and it does not have a hope in hell against it's counter parts, even if you have two support workers and your reloads on your self, so please explain... We would like to know, and explain how it is balanced?

[ This Message was edited by: El Guapo on 2009-07-01 20:15 ]
_________________


Sardaukar
Admiral
Raven Warriors

Joined: October 08, 2002
Posts: 1656
Posted: 2009-07-01 15:19   
I figure this is as good a place as any to post these, mostly for Lark, and also to show that a lot of the damage to that station was delivered by a cruiser and a destroyer on one side, while Lark worked on the other armor facing.

http://files.getdropbox.com/u/442632/Darkspace/00000023.png

http://files.getdropbox.com/u/442632/Darkspace/00000024.png

http://files.getdropbox.com/u/442632/Darkspace/00000025.png
[ This Message was edited by: Sardaukar on 2009-07-01 15:23 ]
_________________


Page created in 0.025113 seconds.


Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Palestar Inc. All rights reserved worldwide.
Terms of use - DarkSpace is a Registered Trademark of PALESTAR